Skip to content
ZENOS
US home services franchise · United States · Local Services

Twelve franchise locations. One broken GBP strategy. Map pack visibility in 90 days.

Anonymized US home-services franchise — rebuilt GBP, citations, and service-area pages, moving from outside the top 10 to top-3 map pack across eight metros.

Outcomes calibrated from Zenos SMB benchmark data (Jul 2026); all case studies are anonymized composite engagements — not named clients.

US franchise local SEO case study — multi-location map pack visibility
US franchise local SEO engagement audit findings and diagnosis
US franchise local SEO measurable campaign outcomes and ROI

01 · The Situation

This US home services franchise network runs 12 locations across the Southeast and Midwest offering pest control, lawn treatment, and exterior cleaning. Corporate marketing ran Google Ads nationally; local visibility depended on Google Business Profile and organic local search.

At audit, zero locations ranked in the map pack top 3 for their core "[city] + [service]" queries. Most sat outside the top 10. Franchisees complained that corporate leads were expensive while local organic demand went to independents with stronger GBP signals.

The franchise model made this harder: corporate had standardized one-size-fits-all descriptions, shared phone routing, and duplicate service-area pages that swapped city names — classic doorway-page risk.

02 · The Diagnosis

We scored each location on our map pack readiness framework (GBP 30%, reviews 25%, citations 20%, on-site 15%, competitive 10%). Network average: 41/100 — "Not map-pack ready."

GBP incompleteness. Wrong primary categories on 7 of 12 profiles. Service lists generic. Photos stale (average last upload 14 months prior). No post cadence.

Review gap vs competition. Local-services benchmark for competitive map presence: ~60 reviews per location in dense markets. The network averaged 22 with review velocity near zero — vs our 8 reviews/month healthy velocity benchmark.

Citation drift. NAP inconsistencies across Yelp, Angi, BBB, and franchise aggregator feeds. Three locations had duplicate GBP listings suppressing the canonical profile.

On-site local proof missing. Corporate site had 12 thin location pages — templated copy, no location-specific proof, no internal linking from service hubs.

03 · What We Did

Phase 1 · GBP rebuild (weeks 1–4). One profile per legitimate storefront. Primary categories corrected per market. Service menus aligned to local search language. Photo refresh schedule — fleet, team, completed jobs. Weekly posts tied to seasonality (mosquito season Florida, aeration season Ohio).

Phase 2 · Review system (weeks 2–8). Post-service SMS review request — one tap to GBP form. Owner response playbook within 24 hours. Velocity reached 9 reviews/month/location average by week 8 — above our 8/month healthy benchmark.

Phase 3 · Citations and duplicates (weeks 3–6). NAP standardized across top 20 directories per market. Duplicate listings merged or suppressed. Franchise corporate feed audited for drift.

Phase 4 · Service-area content (weeks 5–12). Unique location pages: local proof, FAQs per metro, embedded map, internal links from category hubs. No find-replace city spam.

04 · The Results

At 90 days:

  • 8 of 12 locations in map pack top 3 for primary service queries in their metro
  • Remaining 4 moved from outside top 10 to positions 4–7 — pipeline for next quarter
  • Map pack readiness score: 41 → 82 network average ("Likely competitive" band)
  • +156% direction requests in GBP insights vs pre-engagement baseline
  • Phone calls from GBP up 89% network-wide — measured via call tracking per location

Franchisees in Tampa, Charlotte, and Columbus saw the fastest gains — markets where citation cleanup and duplicate suppression unlocked suppressed profiles within weeks.

05 · What's Next

The network is rolling the playbook to four new franchise openings in Q4 — GBP live before doors open, review system day one, location page at launch.

Corporate is integrating Local SEO reporting with Google Ads geo performance so franchisees see paid + organic local demand in one scorecard — no more siloed vendors arguing over who caused the lead drop. For the paid-search operating system behind that scorecard, see multi-location & franchise Google Ads.

National franchise SEO vendors gave us templates. Zenos gave us twelve profiles that actually rank — because each location proved it serves its market.

Franchise Marketing Lead
Anonymized · United States
Similar cases
Benchmark
Pembrokeshire taxi operator local SEO case study — Google Map Pack #1 ranking
Pembrokeshire taxi operator · United Kingdom · LOCAL SEO

The map pack is the only ranking that matters for local taxi. We won it in 90 days.

#1
Google Maps ranking
Read full case
Read full case
Benchmark
US home services Google Ads case study — lead generation and call tracking
US home services operator · United States · GOOGLE ADS

Smart Bidding was optimizing on form fills that never booked. We rebuilt tracking first — ROAS moved from 2.9× to 6.4×.

6.4×
ROAS (post-rebuild)
Read full case
Read full case
Explore

Related services and markets